{rfName}
Th

Indexed in

License and use

Icono OpenAccess

Altmetrics

Grant support

This work was supported by grants from Ayudas Merck Serono Investigacion_Salud 2000, Instituto de Salud Carlos III-ISCIII (Spanish Government) cofunded by FEDER funds/European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)-a way to build Europe (References: PI1102096, PI1401918, PI1500500, PI1501205, RD12/0036/0056, CIBERESP CB06/02/0073, CIBERONC CB16/12/00401). With the support of the Secretariat for Universities and Research of the Department of Business and Knowledge of the Government of Catalonia. Grants to support the activities of research groups (SGR 2014-2017: 2014SGR756 and 2014SGR1077; 2017-2019: 2017SGR1085). Beca de recerca clinica 2016 de l'Academia de Ciencies Mediques de Catalunya i Balears, Department of Health of the Generalitat de Catalunya (PERIS-2016-2020, SLT002/16/00404). Asociacion Espanola Contra el Cancer (personal grant to LA), Rio Hortega-SEOM (ISCIII-Spanish Society of Medical Oncology) (personal grant to MT), and from Sanofi Pasteur MSD and Merck and Co., Inc. None of the funders had any role in the data collection, analysis, interpretation of the results, article writing, and decision to publish.

Analysis of institutional authors

Taberna, MCorresponding AuthorMena, MarisaAuthorTous, SaraAuthorLozano, AliciaCorresponding AuthorMesia, RicardAuthorAlemany, LAuthorBravo, Ignacio G.Author

Share

December 24, 2018
Publications
>
Article

The Use of HPV16-E5, EGFR, and pEGFR as Prognostic Biomarkers for Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients

Publicated to:Frontiers In Oncology. 8 (DEC): 589- - 2018-12-11 8(DEC), DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00589

Authors: Taberna, M; Torres, M; Alejo, M; Mena, M; Tous, S; Marquez, S; Pavon, MA; Leon, X; Garcia, J; Guix, M; Hijano, R; Bonfill, T; Aguila, A; Lozano, A; Mesia, R; Alemany, L; Bravo, IG

Affiliations

Catalan Inst Oncol ICO, Canc Epidemiol Res Program, IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Catalan Inst Oncol ICO, Dept Med Oncol, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Catalan Inst Oncol ICO, Dept Med Oncol, IDIBELL, ONCOBELL, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Catalan Inst Oncol ICO, Dept Radiat Oncol, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Catalan Inst Oncol ID BELL, Canc Epidemiol Res Program, Infect & Canc Lab, Barcelona, Spain - Author
CIBER BBN, Madrid, Spain - Author
CNRS IRD Uni Montp, French Natl Ctr Sci Res, CNRS, Lab MIVEGEC, Montpellier, France - Author
Ctr Invest Biomed Red Canc CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain - Author
Hosp del Mar, Dept Med Oncol, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Hosp del Mar, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Hosp del Mar, IMIM, Canc Res Program, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Hosp Gen lHospitalet, Dept Pathol, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Hosp Santa Creu & Sant Pau, Otorhinolaryngol Dept, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Hosp Univ Parc Tauli, Dept Med Oncol, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Hosp Univ Parc Tauli, Dept Otorhinoleryngol, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Inst Salud Carlos III, CIBERESP, Madrid, Spain - Author
Univ Barcelona, Dept Med, Barcelona, Spain - Author
See more

Abstract

Background: Anti-epidermal-growth-factor-receptor (EGFR) therapies in combination with radiotherapy are being studied on de-escalation clinical trials for HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients. The HPV16-E5 oncoprotein increases recycling of activated EGFR to the cell surface, enhancing factor signal transduction. Our aim was to evaluate viral HPV16-E5 oncogene expression as well as EGFR and phosphorylated-EGFR (pEGFR), protein levels as biomarkers for clinical outcome in a retrospective cohort of OPC patients. Methods: Formalin-fixed-paraffin-embedded OPCs were collected from 1990 to 2013. OPC samples containing HPV-DNA were subject to viral E6* I mRNA detection and p16(INK4a) immunohistochemistry (IHC). HPV16-positive cases were evaluated for HPV16-E5 (RT-PCR) and EGFR/pEGFR (IHC). A stratified and matched random sample of HPV-negative samples was used as control and evaluated for EGFR/pEGFR. Overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) estimates were assessed for locally advanced OPC patients (stage III, IVa, b 7th edition). Results: Among 788 OPC patient samples, 53 were double positive for HPV16-DNA/p(16INK4a). HPV16-E5 expression was found in 41 of 53 samples (77.4%). EGFR expression was observed in 37.7 vs 70.8% of HPV16-positive vs HPV-negative samples, respectively; (adjusted OR = 0.15) 5% CI = 0.04-0.56]). Expression of pEGFR followed an inverse pattern with 39.6 and 24.9% detection in HPV16-positive and HPV-negative samples; (adjusted OR = 1.58 [95% CI = 0.48-5.17]). Within HPV16-positive cases, no association between HPV16-E5/EGFR nor pEGFR was observed. With a median follow-up of 39.36 months (min = 0.03 - max = 272.07), the combination of HPV status and EGFR or pEGFR expression were predictors of better OS (p < 0.001, for both) and DFS (p < 0.001 for EGFR and p = 0.003 for pEGFR). Conclusions: HPV16-E5 is highly expressed on HPV16-positive OPCs. Interestingly, HPV16-positive cases expressed significantly more pEGFR while HPV-negative cases expressed more EGFR. The combinations of HPV status and EGFR or pEGFR may be useful biomarkers for evaluating prognosis outcome in OPC patients.

Keywords

egfrhead and neck cancerhpvhpv16hpv16-e5human papillomavirusoropharyngeal cancerDiagnostic-accuracyEgfrHead and neck cancerHpvHpv16Hpv16-e5Human papillomavirusHuman-papillomavirus type-16Locally advanced headNeck-cancerOropharyngeal cancerP16(ink4a)PegfrPhosphorylated egfrPoor-prognosisSquamous-cell carcinomaSurvival

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Frontiers In Oncology due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2018, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Oncology.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from the Field Citation Ratio (FCR) of the Dimensions source, it yields a value of: 4.87, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: Dimensions Jul 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-07-16, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 20
  • Scopus: 21
  • Europe PMC: 10

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-07-16:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 33.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 32 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 0.75.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 2 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: France.

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (Taberna Sanz, Miren) and Last Author (Gonzalez Bravo, Ignacio).

the authors responsible for correspondence tasks have been Taberna Sanz, Miren and Lozano Borbalas, Alicia.