{rfName}
Na

Indexed in

License and use

Citations

22

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Linares ICorresponding Author
Share
Publications
>
Review

Nanoparticles and nanothermia for malignant brain tumors, a suggestion of treatment for further investigations

Publicated to:Reports Of Practical Oncology And Radiotherapy. 23 (5): 474-480 - 2018-10-01 23(5), DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2018.08.001

Authors: Prieto, C; Linares, I

Affiliations

Inst Catala Oncol, Dept Radiat Oncol, Avinguda Granvia 199-203, Barcelona 08908, Spain - Author
Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Avinguda Granvia, 199-203, 08908, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital San Cecilio, Av. Dr. Olóriz 16, Granada, 18012, Spain - Author
Univ Hosp San Cecilio, Dept Radiat Oncol, Ave Dr Oloriz 16, Granada 18012, Spain - Author

Abstract

Keywords
Antitumor efficacyBreast-cancerChemotherapyDeliveryDoxorubicinGbmGlioblastoma-multiformeLiposomesMehtMild hyperthermiaNanoparticlesReleaseTermosensitiveTherapyThermosensitive liposomes

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Reports Of Practical Oncology And Radiotherapy, Q3 Agency Scopus (SJR), its regional focus and specialization in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, give it significant recognition in a specific niche of scientific knowledge at an international level.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from the Field Citation Ratio (FCR) of the Dimensions source, it yields a value of: 1.22, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: Dimensions May 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-05-15, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 10
  • Scopus: 12
  • OpenCitations: 9
Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-05-15:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 27.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 27 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 0.25.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 1 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.
  • Additionally, the work has been submitted to a journal classified as Diamond in relation to this type of editorial policy.
Leadership analysis of institutional authors

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: Last Author (LINARES GALIANA, ISABEL).

the author responsible for correspondence tasks has been LINARES GALIANA, ISABEL.