{rfName}
Pr

Indexed in

License and use

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Velasco RAuthor

Share

June 7, 2021
Publications
>
Article
No

Prospective Evaluation of Health Care Provider and Patient Assessments in Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neurotoxicity

Publicated to:Neurology. 97 (7): e660-E672 - 2021-08-17 97(7), DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000012300

Authors: Alberti P, Bernasconi DP, Cornblath DR, Jose Merkies IS, Park SB, Velasco R, Bruna J, Psimaras D, Susanne K, Pace A, Dorsey SG, Argyriou AA, Kalofonos HP, Briani C, Schenone A, Faber CG, Mazzeo A, Grisold W, Valsecchi M, Cavaletti G, CI-Perinoms group

Affiliations

Expt Neurol Unit, Monza, Italy - Author
Hosp Univ Bellvitge, ICO Hosp, IDIBELL, Unit Neurooncol,Neurol Dept, Barcelona, Spain - Author
IRCCS Regina Elena Canc Inst, Neurooncol Unit, Rome, Italy - Author
Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA - Author
Ludwig Boltzmann Inst Expt & Clin Traumatol, Vienna, Austria - Author
Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Neurol, Maastricht, Netherlands - Author
NeuroMI Milan Ctr Neurosci, Milan, Italy - Author
St Andrews Gen Hosp Patras, Neurol Dept, Patras, Greece - Author
St Elizabeth Hosp, Dept Neurol, Willemstad, Curacao - Author
Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Ctr Invest Biomed Red Enfermedades Neurodegenerat, Dept Cell Biol Physiol & Immunol, Bellaterra, Spain - Author
Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Inst Neurosci, Ctr Invest Biomed Red Enfermedades Neurodegenerat, Bellaterra, Spain - Author
Univ Essen Gesamthsch, Dept Neurol, Essen, Germany - Author
Univ Essen Gesamthsch, West German Canc Ctr, Essen, Germany - Author
Univ Genoa, Dept Neurosci Rehabil Ophthalmol Genet & Maternal, Genoa, Italy - Author
Univ Maryland, Dept Pain & Translat Symptom Sci, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA - Author
Univ Messina, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Unit Neurol & Neuromuscular Dis, Messina, Italy - Author
Univ Milano Bicocca, Bicocca Bioinformat Biostat & Bioimaging Ctr B4, Sch Med & Surg, Monza, Italy - Author
Univ New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia - Author
Univ Padua, Dept Neurosci, Padua, Italy - Author
Univ Paris Sorbonne, Hop Pitie Salpetriere, Serv Neurol Mazarin, Paris, France - Author
Univ Patras, Med Sch, Div Oncol, Dept Med, Patras, Greece - Author
See more

Abstract

OBJECTIVEThere is not agreement on the "gold standard" for detection and grading of Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neurotoxicity (CIPN) in clinical trials. We performed an observational prospective study to assess and compare both patient-based and physician-based methods.METHODSConsecutive patients, aged 18 years or older, candidates for neurotoxic chemotherapy were enrolled in US/EU/Australia. A trained investigator performed physician-based scales (Total Neuropathy Score clinical [©Johns Hopkins University; TNSc], then used to calculate TNS nurse [TNSn]) and supervised the patient-completed questionnaire (FACT/GOG-NTX©). Evaluations were performed before and at the end of chemotherapy. On participants without neuropathy at baseline we assessed the association between TNSc, TNSn and FACT/GOG-NTX. Considering a previously established Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for FACT/GOG-NTX, we identified participants with and without a clinically important deterioration according to this scale. Then, we calculated the MCID for TNSc and TNSn as the difference in the mean change score of these scales between the two groups.RESULTSData from 254 participants were available, 180 (71%) had normal neurological status at baseline. At the end of the study, 88% of participants developed any grade of neuropathy. TNSc, TNSn and FACT/GOG-NTX showed good responsiveness (standardized mean change from baseline to end of chemotherapy >1 for all scales). On the 153 participants without neuropathy at baseline and treated with a known neurotoxic chemotherapy regimen we verified a moderate correlation in both TNSc and TNSn scores with FACT/GOG-NTX (Spearman correlation index r=0.6). On the same sample, considering as clinically important a change in the FACT/GOG-NTX score of at least 3.3 points, the MCID was 3.7 for TNSc and 2.8 for the TNSn.CONCLUSIONSMCID for TNSc and TNSn have been calculated, and the TNSn can be considered a reliable alternative objective clinical assessment if a more extended neurological examination is not possible. Moreover, the FACT/GOG-NTX score can be reduced to 7 items and these items correlate well with the TNSc and TNSn.CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCEThis study provides Class III evidence that a patient-completed questionnaire and nurse-assessed scale correlate with a physician-assessed scale.© 2021 American Academy of Neurology.

Keywords

assessment toolschildrenminimally important differencesoutcome measurespathogenesisresponsivenessthalidomidevalidityTotal neuropathy score

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Neurology due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2021, it was in position 9/212, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Clinical Neurology. Notably, the journal is positioned above the 90th percentile.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from the Field Citation Ratio (FCR) of the Dimensions source, it yields a value of: 9.89, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: Dimensions Jul 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-07-21, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 2
  • Europe PMC: 9

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-07-21:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 42.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 41 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 4.25.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 6 (Altmetric).

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: Australia; Austria; France; Germany; Greece; Italy; Netherlands; Timor-Leste.